06-29-2017, 02:19 PM
0
As the title states, quartz is way more robust than purely mechanical watches. The less moving parts the better right?
Adminishing the #$@ out of it
Hi Guest - won't you sign up - like now? You'll get "early member" perks, ratings, free for sale adds, store discount codes and of course access to all the hidden stuff that status begets..
| Recent threads from Collectionist | |||
| Threads | Date | Replies | |
| Vintage Oris adds | 11-06-2019, 03:26 PM | 1 | |
| The Seiko Superior value & reference list | 03-30-2019, 01:29 AM | 1 | |
| The Seiko Grand Quartz value list | 03-28-2019, 09:52 PM | 2 | |
| The King Quartz value list | 03-28-2019, 02:05 PM | 0 | |
| The Great Vintage Seiko Retail List | 03-22-2019, 04:38 PM | 7 | |
| Poll: Quartz is more robust than mechanical This poll is closed. |
|||
| yes | 18 | 72.00% | |
| No | 7 | 28.00% | |
| Total | 25 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Thread Rating:
![[-]](https://www.watchiwant.com/images/collapse.png "[-]") |
| robust quartz watches are the most |
|
The most robust watches are quartz
|
Posts: 545
Threads: 219 Thanks Received: 205 in 89 posts Thanks Given: 121 Joined: May 2017 Reputation: 186 Current Collection:
Thanks Meter 9%
 
Posts: 361
Threads: 75 Thanks Received: 126 in 49 posts Thanks Given: 70 Joined: May 2017 Reputation: 133 Thanks Meter 7%
06-29-2017, 02:22 PM
0 Great idea admin! This could answer a lot of quick questions a member might have... I will post one myself.
Posts: 46
Threads: 4 Thanks Received: 4 in 2 posts Thanks Given: 7 Joined: May 2017 Reputation: 12 Thanks Meter 1%
06-29-2017, 02:32 PM
0 For sure, quartz rules the bunch. Still I have as much quartz as mechanicals - hand wound and automatic. Why is that?
Posts: 50
Threads: 5 Thanks Received: 9 in 4 posts Thanks Given: 10 Joined: May 2017 Reputation: 9 Thanks Meter 1%
07-01-2017, 10:16 PM
3  Of course not! It is the watch with no moving parts.... A LCD G-Shock perhaps?
Posts: 107
Threads: 14 Thanks Received: 32 in 12 posts Thanks Given: 23 Joined: May 2017 Reputation: 36 Thanks Meter 2%
Posts: 41
Threads: 1 Thanks Received: 1 in 1 posts Thanks Given: 3 Joined: Jun 2017 Reputation: 11 Thanks Meter 1%
07-03-2017, 09:39 PM
0 Yup, have to get me a G-shock. That way I can have a car run me over and still know at what time and date this happened (insurance policy).
Posts: 29
Threads: 2 Thanks Received: 3 in 2 posts Thanks Given: 8 Joined: Jun 2017 Reputation: 4 Thanks Meter 0%
07-03-2017, 10:18 PM
0 Damn! I voted before reading. Of course a watch with no moving parts is better. Then, that would be a smart watch - lol?
Posts: 43
Threads: 3 Thanks Received: 2 in 1 posts Thanks Given: 15 Joined: May 2017 Reputation: 9 Thanks Meter 1%
07-07-2017, 07:49 PM
0 Robust, as in "never let me down"? Hicking in the Ozarks... damn, my battery ran out - now what. I hate my robust watch, should have brought a solar...
D'oh!
Posts: 66
Threads: 3 Thanks Received: 7 in 3 posts Thanks Given: 7 Joined: Jul 2017 Reputation: 17 Thanks Meter 1%
Posts: 23
Threads: 1 Thanks Received: 12 in 1 posts Thanks Given: 4 Joined: Oct 2017 Reputation: 6 Thanks Meter 0%
11-07-2017, 02:38 PM
Posts: 33
Threads: 0 Thanks Received: 0 in 0 posts Thanks Given: 7 Joined: Jul 2017 Reputation: 5 Thanks Meter 0%
12-28-2017, 02:51 PM
0 That would be nice @PaltryJack... Only the fact remains that we are collectors!
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
